What Actually Determines STR Profitability Once Friction Is Included

Gross revenue is the most misleading number in short-term rentals.
High nightly rates and full calendars often obscure the friction that ultimately determines whether an STR is profitable—or merely busy.

In Thailand, seasonality, turnover costs, utilities, management fees, and maintenance compound quickly. Without accounting for these factors, profitability projections are almost always overstated.

What this article covers

The financial mechanics of short-term rentals in Thailand—what truly drives profitability once all costs, variability, and operational friction are accounted for. It breaks down revenue inputs (occupancy, rates, length of stay) and expense drivers (cleaning, utilities, management, maintenance, fees), and explains how to underwrite an STR beyond headline gross income.

What this article does NOT cover

This article does not provide legal or tax advice, though it references taxation at a high level. It does not restate market demand dynamics or operational management models. The focus is financial reality: net income, yield, and risk-adjusted performance.

Who this article is for

Investors and property owners evaluating whether an STR in Thailand is financially viable. It is designed for readers comparing short-term rentals to long-term leasing, or questioning why strong booking volume does not translate into expected net returns.

What decision this article enables

A clear go / no-go or adjustment decision. By understanding how friction erodes gross revenue, readers can estimate realistic net income or ROI, stress-test assumptions, and decide whether an STR meets their financial objectives—or requires restructuring.

Executive Summary: Short-term rental profitability in Thailand hinges on balancing revenue with numerous friction costs. Revenue is driven by nightly rates and occupancy – for example, a Bangkok condo might have an ADR around ฿1,800 and ~65% occupancy, while a Phuket villa could get ฿5,000+ ADR but with heavy seasonal vacancy. Expenses stack up quickly: platform fees, cleaning, higher utility bills, frequent maintenance, furnishing depreciation, taxes, and often management commissions all eat into profits. When underwriting an STR, one must account for these frictions. A property that might gross ฿100k/month in peak season could net far less once low-season slumps and costs are averaged in. Many Thai STRs, after all costs, end up with net yields only slightly above traditional long-term rentals, unless they operate in highly optimized conditions. The key determinants of profitability include achieving sufficient occupancy year-round, controlling operating costs (through efficient management and maintenance), and avoiding extended downtime (from repairs or legal issues). In short, headline numbers can be misleading – thorough analysis often reveals STR profits are slimmer and require more work than initial glance suggests. Proper underwriting ensures you know what you’re getting into financially.

What revenue factors drive a Thai STR’s income?

The two main revenue drivers are occupancy (how often you book nights) and average daily rate (ADR). These are multiplicative – Occupancy × ADR × number of nights = Gross Revenue. In Thailand’s tourist markets, neither is static year-round:

• Occupancy in a place like Bangkok might average around 60-70% over a year (with fairly small seasonal variation), whereas in Phuket or Samui, you might see 80-90% occupancy in high season and as low as 20-30% in rainy off-season months, averaging perhaps 50-60% annually. When underwriting, you should map out an occupancy calendar by month, not just assume a flat rate. A common mistake is to take a peak season occupancy and project it for 12 months – that will wildly overestimate revenue in resort areas. Urban STRs are more even, but even there, you’ll have slow weeks (e.g., a quiet week in Bangkok during a lull) and some surge weeks. It’s safer to be conservative: for instance, assume lower occupancy in off-peak and not fully 100% even in peak.
• ADR (Average Daily Rate) depends on property type, location, and quality. A luxury villa in Koh Samui might command $300 (฿10k+) per night in high season, but drop to $100 (฿3.3k) in low season to attract any guests. A studio condo in Chiang Mai could be ฿1,000/night in cool season and maybe ฿600 in the smoky season when demand is low. Moreover, smart hosts use dynamic pricing – raising rates for holiday periods (Songkran, Christmas/New Year) and lowering during lulls. So underwriting revenue means considering a range of ADRs throughout the year. It’s wise to err on the side of caution: use a weighted average ADR a bit lower than your peak nightly rate, to account for discounted periods.
• Booking lead time and pacing: Thai STR markets often have many last-minute bookings (especially from domestic travelers). This means you might keep your rates high and then drop them a week out to fill remaining gaps. That strategy can maximize revenue but makes forecasting tricky. When analyzing, know that you won’t fill every night; there will be vacant days between bookings (turnover gaps or simply unsold nights). A 70% occupancy doesn’t mean every week has exactly 5 nights booked; it might mean fully booked for three weeks and empty for one week, etc.
• Length of stay patterns: If your STR tends to get 1-2 night bookings (common in cities or for party destinations), you’ll have more unbookable nights due to cleaning turnaround and check-in/out timing. If you often get week-long bookings, you’ll have relatively fewer gaps. This can subtly affect revenue – lots of one-nighters can actually lower effective occupancy because each booking may prevent another booking on adjacent nights due to awkward gaps. Some hosts mitigate this by setting minimum stays or by strategically timing check-ins. When underwriting, consider what average stay length you expect; longer average stays generally increase effective occupancy and reduce per-booking costs.

To project revenue, build it from the ground up: estimate occupancy and ADR for each month (or season), and multiply out. Don’t just do “฿X per night * 365 * Y% occupancy” without seasonal nuance. That simplistic formula often overshoots actual revenue.

What costs and frictions reduce STR income?

Short-term rentals have more line-item expenses than a traditional lease. Key cost factors include:

• Cleaning and Laundry: After every guest (sometimes mid-stay for longer bookings if offered). In Thailand, labor is cheaper than many countries – you might pay ฿500-฿1000 for a condo turnover including laundry of linens. If you do it yourself, it’s your time cost. Many hosts pass on cleaning fees to guests as a separate charge, but that can’t always be too high or it deters short bookings. Also, a high cleaning fee might cover direct cleaner cost but not things like replacing linens regularly. Frequent cleans also mean faster wear on towels, sheets, etc., which is an indirect cost.
• Utilities: Unlike long-term tenants who pay their own, STR hosts usually cover electricity, water, internet, etc. Air-conditioning in particular can be a huge cost – tourists might run AC 24/7. A villa with a pool also has pool pump electricity. In a hot country like Thailand, electricity can erode a lot of profit. Example: a small condo might have an electric bill of ฿1500-฿2500 in a month with moderate use; if guests run AC nonstop, it could be double. Water is usually cheap, but if there’s a garden or pool to top up, those add. Don’t forget Wi-Fi and perhaps cable TV or streaming subscriptions – small individually, but they add to monthly fixed costs.
• Platform fees and payment processing: Airbnb charges hosts ~3% and guests ~14% (on top of the rate). Booking.com charges hosts ~15%. So either way, around 15% of gross goes to the platform (split in Airbnb’s case). If you list at ฿3000/night and get 10 nights (฿30k gross), you might only receive ~฿26k after fees. And if you use channel management software or a property management system, that could be another few percent or a monthly subscription. If you take direct bookings via credit card or PayPal, factor those ~3% processing fees as well.
• Management or staffing: If you hire an STR manager (co-host or company), that’s 20-30% of revenue off the top. Even if not, you might pay a local person per check-in or a monthly retainer to a neighbor to be on-call. Some hosts give building reception or security a small tip or monthly amount to smooth the process of guests coming and going (this happens in some condo STR operations – essentially “tea money” for the guards to not hassle your guests). While not a formal expense, it’s wise in some condos to allocate a goodwill budget for building staff.
• Maintenance and Repairs: Things will break or need upkeep – aircon servicing, a fresh coat of paint every year or two, fixing appliances, etc. You should set aside maybe 5-10% of gross revenue for maintenance. Tropical climate can be tough on properties (mold, rust), and guests are often less careful than long-term renters (suitcases ding walls, they might break a dish or stain a sofa). Expect higher replacement costs. After a couple of years, you’ll be replacing linens frequently, maybe a mattress or sofa if heavily used. These costs aren’t monthly but need to be averaged in. Essentially, depreciation is faster – budget for it.
• Insurance: Ideally you have property insurance that covers STR use (not all homeowner policies do). Insurance in Thailand might not explicitly cover short-term rental scenarios unless you get a specific rider. Some hosts skip this or just have basic fire insurance, but that’s risky. If you do get comprehensive coverage (including liability if a guest gets hurt), include that premium in costs. It’s usually a few thousand baht a year for basic coverage; more if covering contents extensively.
• Taxes: Rental income in Thailand is subject to personal income tax (for locals or foreigners filing Thai taxes). Officially, one can deduct 30% as expenses or use actual expenses, then pay on the rest at progressive rates. Many small hosts might not fully declare, but an investor should factor tax in an honest projection. There’s also local property tax. Under the new Land and Building Tax (effective 2020), a home used for commercial rental would likely fall under the “commercial” rate category – roughly 0.3% of assessed value per year (with some variances by municipality). The old house & land tax was 12.5% of annual rental income, but now it’s value-based. For a condo worth ฿5m, 0.3% is ฿15k/year. It’s not huge, but not zero. Many hosts ignore taxes in their calc (or choose not to pay), but as an investor you should count it in to be safe or in case you want to stay compliant. Tax and legal fines can hit later if not considered.

Adding all these, it’s not uncommon that 50% or more of gross rental revenue goes to expenses. For example: Out of ฿100 of guest payment, perhaps 15 goes to OTA fees, ~10 to cleaning, ~5 to utilities, ~25 to management, ~5 to maintenance reserve, ~5 to taxes – leaving ~฿40 of profit, or a 40% margin. And that’s before accounting for any mortgage interest if you have a loan. It can shrink further in bad months with low occupancy (fixed costs like internet still accrue).

How do legal and compliance factors figure into profitability?

Legal friction can translate into monetary costs or lost income:

• Forced vacancies due to enforcement: If you have to stop renting for a while because of legal warnings or building crackdown, that downtime hits revenue. When underwriting, include a vacancy allowance – not just for seasonality, but for unexpected stoppages. Maybe assume a couple of weeks a year of potential downtime (beyond normal vacancy) to be conservative.
• Fines or penalties: Getting caught renting illegally can incur fines (tens of thousands of baht potentially). While one hopes to avoid this entirely, an investor might still set aside a contingency for legal costs. It’s morbid to plan for, but say every few years a ฿50k fine happens, that averages ~฿1.5k per month “expense” in the long run.
• Licensing or compliance costs: If you attempt to legalize (e.g., get a small hotel license or register under the homestay rule), there will be costs to meet requirements – maybe renovations for fire safety, extra insurance, paperwork fees, etc. Most small STRs can’t fully license under current law unless they meet the homestay criteria. But if you anticipate changes (like a future STR permit system with fees), consider that in your projections as a potential cost.
• Higher insurance or security measures: Running an STR might prompt extra spending on safety/security – e.g., installing a digital lock or CCTV camera, buying extra liability insurance. Those upfront costs and any ongoing fees should be factored. They often improve the operation (leading to better reviews or prevention of issues), but they hit the budget too.
• Opportunity cost of caution: If you’re operating under the radar, you might limit how aggressively you market. For example, you might not list on as many sites, or you keep your prices slightly lower to attract less attention (some hosts do this thinking a constant high occupancy in a condo draws more complaints). This is hard to quantify, but it’s a potential hidden cost – basically not maxing revenue in order to minimize conflict. An investor should at least mentally account for the fact that legal concerns could cap their earning potential compared to an unfettered scenario.

Basically, legal issues often either cause downtime or add costs – both lowering effective profit. A robust underwriting might run a scenario with zero legal disruptions and one with some, to see sensitivity. At the least, building a cash buffer for unexpected fines or stoppages is wise; if it never gets used, great, that’s extra profit or can fund upgrades later.

How does STR profitability compare to long-term rental?

Many investors ask: do short-term rentals really earn more after all this hassle? The answer usually is: gross, yes; net, somewhat more; risk-adjusted, it depends on execution.

• In Thailand, long-term rental yields (annual rent divided by purchase price) might be ~4-5% in Bangkok for a condo, maybe a bit more in tourist towns if you buy cheaply. Some resort condos sold to foreigners promise 6-7% via rental programs (often unrealistic long-run). That’s a baseline to beat.
• A well-run STR might double the gross rent of a long-term lease. For example, a condo that could rent for ฿20k/month on a one-year lease might gross ฿40k as an Airbnb (assuming strong location and consistent bookings). But as we saw, expenses might consume half or more of that, leaving maybe ฿20k net – which is similar to the long-term lease net (since long-term has minimal expenses). In cases where owners self-manage efficiently and avoid big vacant periods, they might net 1.5 times what a long-term lease would yield. It is higher, but it’s an active endeavor, not passive.
• The advantage is more pronounced if the property is unique or in a high-demand spot with limited hotel supply. For instance, a pool villa in a touristy area might long-term rent for ฿100k/month (few locals would pay that), but as a nightly rental it could gross much more in high season then sit empty some months and still beat ฿100k * 12 at year-end. Those exceptional cases aside, the average condo STR might only modestly outperform a long-term rental on a net basis.
• One also must factor volatility: long-term you get steady rent (until a tenant moves out, which could cause a vacancy, but often that’s filled in a month or two). STR can have wildly fluctuating income. A great high season then a near-zero low season – you need to budget and have cash reserves to cover lean times (and any mortgage). That risk and stress can make the slightly higher returns not worth it for some.
• Another factor: personal use. Some owners do STR not just for yield but so they or family can use the property occasionally (common with vacation condos). This flexibility is a non-monetary benefit of STR vs. having a fixed tenant. While it doesn’t show up in ROI, it’s part of the appeal – you effectively get some free stay value out of the asset. If that’s important to you, STR may be preferable even if pure ROI is similar to a long lease.

From an underwriting perspective, it’s good to compare the STR scenario to a realistic long-term scenario. If an STR is only, say, 20% better in net yield, an investor might ask if that’s worth the extra effort and risk. For some it will be (especially if they enjoy hospitality or need that extra income), for others maybe not.

Often, we find that where STR truly shines is when the investor brings exceptional management to the table or picks undervalued properties for STR use. If you just buy a market-price condo and hand it to a manager, your net might be only a bit better than a normal tenant – the manager and costs eat the upside. But if you personally hustle (manage it yourself, decorate beautifully, market cleverly), you keep more profit and can significantly beat a conventional lease. It’s essentially a small business margin vs. a passive investment margin

What occupancy is needed to break even on an STR?

This is part of underwriting: find your break-even occupancy. Roughly, calculate your fixed monthly costs: e.g., condo fee, internet, insurance, property tax, etc. (let’s say ฿10k/month). Then figure variable cost per occupied night: cleaning (amortize per night; e.g., ฿600 per stay divided by number of nights in that stay, maybe ~฿150/night average), utilities (maybe ฿100/night for a condo), consumables (toiletries, etc., small but say ฿50/night), platform fee (say 15% of rate). If your average nightly rate is ฿2000, platform takes ฿300, direct variable costs maybe ฿300, leaving ฿1400 contribution per booked night. Now, fixed costs ฿10k divided by ฿1400 ≈ 7.1 nights. So about 8 nights (roughly 27% occupancy) to cover cash expenses. If you have a mortgage, include that in fixed costs too (though that’s more of an investment finance cost, not property operating cost).

This break-even tells you baseline occupancy to not lose money out-of-pocket. To profit, you aim above that. It also informs pricing strategy: if you’re way below break-even occupancy, maybe it’s low season and you might consider dropping price to at least cover costs vs. sitting empty.

Each property will differ. Higher fixed costs (like high condo fees, or expensive loan payments) mean you need more nights. Lower ADR means each night contributes less margin, so again more nights needed. Running these numbers is crucial before diving in – some find that realistically they’ll only break even at, say, 40% occupancy, which might be hard in their market.

How can I improve net yield on an STR?

Improving profit margin can come from both boosting revenue and trimming costs:

• Revenue side: beyond occupancy and ADR tactics we covered (dynamic pricing, longer stays, etc.), upselling services can help (like airport pickups, tours – though those require coordination). If you can consistently attract longer bookings (monthly), you cut costs and possibly get steadier income at slightly lower ADR but higher net yield. Also, focus on getting good reviews – that will allow you to charge a premium over time compared to a similar unit with poorer reviews.
• Cost side: efficiency is key. Find a reliable cleaner at a good rate (and treat them well so they stay). Use energy-saving devices – e.g., keycard switches that turn power off when guests leave (common in hotels) can cut electricity costs significantly, but might not be feasible to install in all properties. Smart AC thermostats or sensors can also help if you can implement them, ensuring AC isn’t running with doors open, etc. Using durable furnishings may have higher upfront cost but save replacement costs (e.g., invest in high-quality bedding that can handle frequent laundering).
• Management fees: If you’re paying a high commission to a company, see if you can negotiate down after some time or if you scale to multiple properties with them. Some hosts start with full-service management then switch to a cheaper co-host or self-manage after learning the ropes and establishing an operation routine – effectively “insourcing” to improve net.
• Tax efficiency: Ensure you take advantage of the 30% expense deduction if you’re paying taxes in Thailand – or track actual expenses if higher. Many small hosts don’t pay taxes, but an investor likely should budget for it. However, using legitimate deductions (like depreciation of furniture, etc.) can reduce taxable income and improve post-tax yield. Consult a Thai tax advisor on how to structure things (for instance, some set up a company if scale justifies, which can have different tax treatment but also costs).
• Occupancy optimization: It sounds obvious, but minimizing gaps can boost effective yield without raising ADR. If you notice frequent one-night gaps between bookings, consider adjusting settings like check-in days or minimum stays to close those gaps. For example, if you often have a single night free between bookings, maybe require 2-night minimum so that one-nighters don’t create stranded single nights before/after them. Filling an extra 5% of nights that would otherwise go empty goes straight to the bottom line.

In practice, many small improvements can add up: saving ฿500 here, ฿1000 there per month might raise net yield by 0.5-1%. It requires attentiveness – STR profitability favors active management more than “buy and hold” investing.

FAQ

Q1: How can I calculate a realistic break-even occupancy for my STR? A1: First, calculate your fixed monthly expenses: e.g., condo fees, insurance, internet, property taxes, etc., plus any mortgage interest if you consider that in cash flow. Say those sum to ฿15,000/month. Then estimate variable cost per occupied night: cleaning (e.g., ฿600 per turnover, average maybe ฿200/night if average stay 3 nights), utilities (maybe ฿100/night for a condo), consumables (฿50/night), and platform fees (~15% of rate). If your average nightly rate is ฿2,000, platform takes ~฿300, other variable costs ~฿350, leaving ~฿1,350 contribution per booked night. Now divide monthly fixed ฿15,000 by ฿1,350 ≈ 11.1 nights. So about 12 nights (roughly 40% occupancy) to cover all cash outflows. That would be your break-even occupancy. If you have debt service, include that too (though some would treat mortgage principal as building equity rather than expense). You can do a simpler calc excluding mortgage to see operational break-even, and another including it to see total break-even on cashflow. This helps you know the minimum occupancy you need at your average rate. If it seems high (like needing 80% occupancy), you either need to cut costs or realize the investment might not be viable.

Q2: What kind of ROI can I expect on furnishing and setup costs? A2: Furnishing an STR is essential – guests expect a fully equipped, nicely decorated space. The ROI on furnishing is a bit hard to isolate, but think of it this way: a well-furnished place might earn a higher ADR and higher occupancy (due to better reviews and photos) than a poorly furnished one. If spending an extra ฿100k on decor lets you charge even ฿200 more per night and improves occupancy a few points, it could pay back within a couple high seasons. For example, say you get +฿200/night and +20 nights a year because of better appeal – that’s ฿4,000 extra per year, not huge, but often good decor yields more than just price – it yields satisfied guests who leave good reviews, which yields more bookings. It’s somewhat intangible but generally, in STR, design matters. We’ve seen very high ROI for small touches: e.g., investing in professional photos (a few thousand baht) can boost bookings significantly – an immediate return. Or putting in a nice coffee maker and free coffee might cost ฿5,000 upfront and ฿500/month, but could easily justify a slightly higher rate and reviews that mention it. When underwriting, include initial setup costs and perhaps amortize them over a few years (since furniture has a lifespan). If the numbers still work after burdening those costs, great. Often they do, as long as you’re not overspending on ultra-luxury items that your target guest won’t pay extra for. Focus on durable, easy-to-clean, yet aesthetic furnishings – ROI there is seen in operational ease and guest satisfaction.

Q3: How do I account for my own time in managing an STR when calculating returns? A3: This is often overlooked. If you self-manage, you should assign a notional cost to your own time to see the true economic return. For instance, if you spend 20 hours a month and you value your time at ฿500/hour, that’s ฿10,000 “worth” of your time spent. If your STR nets ฿30,000 before accounting for your time, and ฿20,000 after, that means effectively your labor provided ฿10k of value. Some would say the STR net yield is a bit illusory then – you basically paid yourself by working. If you could earn more doing something else with those hours, maybe not worth it. If you enjoy it or it’s part of your investment strategy, then that’s fine. But from an underwriting perspective, especially if comparing to a long-term rental, include an allowance for management. Often we put, say, 5-10% of revenue as a management expense even if self-managed – that simulates paying yourself. It gives a clearer comparison: perhaps net yield is only slightly above a long-term rental once you factor that. Or if it’s still way higher, you at least know you’re “earning” that through your effort. It’s important for scaling too: if you eventually hire someone, you know what portion of income can go to that.

Q4: What’s the biggest financial risk for STRs in Thailand that investors often forget? A4: Occupancy risk and regulatory risk are big ones. People often overly focus on nightly rate and assume they can achieve high occupancy year-round. They forget how long low season can feel with little to no income. We touched on oversupply – if new hosts flood the market (often due to optimistic news or after a good season), rates and occupancy can fall. An investor may have a rosy scenario that doesn’t pan out because the competitive landscape changed. Also, currency and travel trends matter: a strong baht or a global recession can reduce tourist numbers more than expected, hurting STRs specifically. Another risk is property-specific: an STR is only as good as its reviews – a couple of bad incidents (maybe a major appliance fails and multiple guests leave bad reviews) can crater your bookings until you recover. That kind of operational risk is less in a long-term rental scenario. Essentially, STR income can be more fragile. Thus, investors should maintain a cash cushion and not rely on every month’s income as given. Many learn this the hard way with events like COVID or local crackdowns. So, stress-test your finances: if income dropped 50% for six months, can you handle it? If not, you’re cutting it thin.

Q5: How can I minimize risk and maximize profit when investing in an STR? A5: To minimize risk:

• Choose a property that can work in multiple ways (if STR falters, you can rent long-term or sell to end-users).
• Don’t over-leverage; leave some breathing room in case of revenue fluctuations.
• Invest in quality management (even if it’s your own time) – this prevents bad reviews and keeps occupancy up.
• Understand the local market – if possible, start with one STR and learn, before buying several.
• Stay compliant enough to avoid major legal disruptions (like perhaps sticking to the homestay model or at least being on good terms with neighbors). To maximize profit:
• Focus on guest experience to drive reviews and repeat visits (small touches can justify higher rates and occupancy).
• Keep a close eye on pricing – use tools or manual checks to ensure you’re priced optimally for both high and low seasons.
• Manage costs aggressively – negotiate good deals with cleaners, buy supplies in bulk, use tech to reduce energy waste.
• Consider niches: e.g., pet-friendly STRs can charge more as there’s limited supply; or family-oriented STRs with baby gear provided can attract a premium segment. Sometimes catering to an underserved niche boosts occupancy and allows premium pricing.
• Expand carefully: if one property goes well, you can scale to a second, benefiting from learnings and perhaps shared resources (same cleaner for both, etc., reducing per-unit cost).

Essentially, treat it not just as property investment but as running a hospitality micro-business. Those who do so often see much better returns than those who treat it passively. Underwriting with realism and managing with proactivity are the secrets to STR success.

Related Analysis

To evaluate whether the risk and effort for those yields is worthwhile, see "Investment Opportunity Patterns", which discusses where STR investments truly pay off versus where they can disappoint, tying together the profitability factors with market context.

If you want to revisit how management fees or distribution choices feed into these economics, refer to "Management Models & Control" and "Distribution & Visibility" – decisions there directly impact your bottom line calculations.

STRA 2026 — Gather · Connect · Grow

Bangkok • 11–12 February 2026 — Asia’s STR operator community meets

Two days. One room. The people actually running STR portfolios across Asia. Operator playbooks, distribution reality, regulation updates, and dealflow — compressed into a single calendar slot.

Date: 11–12 February 2026
Location: Bangkok, Thailand

If you’re building, buying, managing, or enabling STRs in Asia, this is the fastest way to calibrate your model against what’s working (and what’s quietly breaking) in the region.

Prefer to book direct? Use STRA’s ticketing page: shorttermrentalsasia.com/ticketing

TTA Reader Preferred Rate

$348.50

Delegate Pass (2 days)
25% Preferred Rate

Includes

• Full access (sessions + networking)
• Digital conference materials
• Lunch & refreshments
• Priority seating

Book via TTA Preferred Rate

Or book direct via STRA’s ticketing page (link on the left). Same event — choose your checkout path.

Courtesy link only — The Thailand Advisor remains independent. Tickets and pricing are sold/managed by STRA.